Seeley v. Crews
| CLARENCE WAYNE SEELEY, III |
| DEPUTY STEPHEN CREWS, State Official |
| 26-1266 |
| July 8, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 [11296776] Jurisdiction challenged. Appellant's memorandum brief due 07/29/2026 for Clarence Wayne Seeley III. Briefing on the merits is suspended pending further order of the court. [26-1266] [Entered: 07/08/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11296681] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/08/2026. Notice of appearance due on 08/07/2026 for Clarence Wayne Seeley III. [26-1266] [Entered: 07/08/2026 01:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Seeley v. Crews | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CLARENCE WAYNE SEELEY, III | |
| Represented By: | Clarence Wayne Seeley III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DEPUTY STEPHEN CREWS, State Official | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
