Yajia Schwartz v. Eaglebank, et al
| YAJIA HU SCHWARTZ, individually and as trustee of the Yajia Hu Schwartz Revocable Trust dated December 1, 2017 |
| SHULMAN ROGERS PA, a Maryland professional association, WILLIAM T. MCKNEW, an individual, BENJAMIN P. SMITH, an individual and EAGLEBANK, a Maryland banking corporation |
| 26-1431 |
| October 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Negotiable Instruments |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 [11331262] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Patrick Gabriel Compton, Esq. and Jocelyn Sitton for Eaglebank, Mr. Benjamin P. Smith, Mr. William T. McKnew and Shulman Rogers PA. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10/27/2026. Manner of Service: email [26-1431] [Entered: 10/27/2026 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 [11331255] Entry of appearance submitted by Patrick G. Compton and Jocelyn A. Sitton for Appellees Mr. William T. McKnew, Mr. Benjamin P. Smith, Shulman Rogers PA and Eaglebank for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 10/27/2026. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 10/27/2026 by JJH to remove pdf as pleading filed 10/27/2026] [26-1431] PGC [Entered: 10/27/2026 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 [11330789] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/26/2026 Docketing statement due 11/09/2026 for Yajia Hu Schwartz. Transcript order form due 11/09/2026 for Yajia Hu Schwartz. Notice of appearance due on 11/09/2026 for Eaglebank, William T. McKnew, Yajia Hu Schwartz, Shulman Rogers PA and Benjamin P. Smith. Disclosure statement due on 11/09/2026 for Eaglebank and Shulman Rogers PA. [26-1431] [Entered: 10/26/2026 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.