Robertson v. Robertson
| BELINDA ROBERTSON |
| CALE ROBERTSON |
| 26-2070 |
| May 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 [11291184] Appellant's motion filed by Belinda Robertson for permission of filing electronic. [26-2070] [Entered: 06/17/2026 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 11 [11287371] Supplemental record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Volume I - Pleadings. [26-2070] [Entered: 06/03/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 [11287367] Minute order filed - The court on its own motion supplements the record for this appeal with the following documents on the district court docket: DC Dkt. Nos. 4 (the notice of removal), 6 (Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazeas Show Cause Order), 13 (Belinda Robertsons motion requesting trial), 17 (the district courts order denying Ms. Robertsons first motion for reconsideration), and 18 (Ms. Robertsons second motion for reconsideration). This appeal is at issue. Ms. Robertson need do nothing more. The court will decide this appeal in due course and notify Ms. Robertson when it has reached its decision. (Text Only - No Attachment) [26-2070] [Entered: 06/03/2026 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 [11284853] Second entry of appearance filed by Belinda Robertson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 05/26/2026. Manner of Service: US mail [26-2070] [Entered: 05/26/2026 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 [11282695] Appellant brief filed by Belinda Robertson. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? n. [26-2070] [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 [11282693] Appellant's motion filed by Belinda Robertson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. [26-2070] [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 [11282692] Entry of appearance filed by Belinda Robertson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. [26-2070] [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 [11282690] Consent to electronic service filed by filed by Belinda Robertson. [26-2070] [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 [11280659] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Volume 1 - Pleadings. [26-2070] [Entered: 05/11/2026 06:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11279973] Jurisdictional review complete. Fee or ifp forms, notice of appearane and appellant's brief due by 06/16/2026 for Belinda Robertson. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 05/28/2026 [26-2070] [Entered: 05/07/2026 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 2 [11279971] District court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. [26-2070] [Entered: 05/07/2026 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 [11278829] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 05/04/2026 Notice of appearance due on 06/03/2026 for Belinda Robertson. [26-2070] [Entered: 05/04/2026 03:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robertson v. Robertson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BELINDA ROBERTSON | |
| Represented By: | Belinda Robertson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CALE ROBERTSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
