Smith v. Chandler, et al
| MELISSA MAE SMITH |
| GEORGE CHANDLER, PAT RALSTON, PAUL MARTIN, JODIE YARBOROUGH and DOES 1-10 |
| 26-2128 |
| July 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Patent |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 [11317960] Appellant's motion filed by Melissa Mae Smith for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 09/14/2026. Manner of Service: email. [26-2128] [Entered: 09/15/2026 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 6 [11317957] Appellant brief filed by Melissa Mae Smith. Served on 09/14/2026 by email. Required 10th Cir. R. 28.2 Attachments Included? n. [26-2128] [Entered: 09/15/2026 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 5 [11317954] Entry of appearance filed by Melissa Mae Smith. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Already listed in the appeal. Served on 09/14/2026. Manner of Service: email [26-2128] [Entered: 09/15/2026 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 4 [11305372] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Vol. 1-pleadings. [26-2128] [Entered: 08/05/2026 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11304780] Jurisdictional review complete. Fee or ifp forms, opening brief, and notice of appearance due by 09/14/2026 for Melissa Mae Smith. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 08/25/2026 [26-2128] [Entered: 08/04/2026 07:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 [11304779] District court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. [26-2128] [Entered: 08/04/2026 07:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 [11303679] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/30/2026. Notice of appearance due on 08/31/2026 for Melissa Mae Smith. [26-2128] [Entered: 07/30/2026 10:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.