Degroat v. Cordero
| JOY EVELYN DEGROAT |
| MARCOS CORDERO |
| 26-2144 |
| September 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 [11313600] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/01/2026. Docketing statement due 09/15/2026 for Joy Evelyn Degroat. Transcript order form due 09/15/2026 for Joy Evelyn Degroat. Notice of appearance due on 09/15/2026 for Marcos Cordero and Joy Evelyn Degroat [26-2144] [Entered: 09/01/2026 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Degroat v. Cordero | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOY EVELYN DEGROAT | |
| Represented By: | Dwight E. Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARCOS CORDERO | |
| Represented By: | Bryan Christopher Garcia |
| Represented By: | Jade Delfin |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Deakyne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
