United States v. Medel
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| GUILLERMO MEDEL, JR. |
| 26-2196 |
| November 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 [11336205] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 11/12/2026. Docketing statement, A/Pet designation of record, transcript order form, appointment motion and notice of appearance due 11/30/2026 for Guillermo Medel Jr. Notice of appearance and disclosure statement due on 11/30/2026 for United States of America. [26-2196] [Entered: 11/12/2026 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Medel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GUILLERMO MEDEL, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Emily P. Carey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Natasha Moghadam |
| Represented By: | Sarah J. Mease |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
