Loki Operations, et al v. Textron Aviation, et al
| LOKI OPERATIONS, LLC, BOGDAN COCOSEL, ADAM HAFEZ, APSIS AVIATION, LLC, BEN EATER, JON-MICHAEL JOHNSON, MATERA MANAGEMENT, LLC, ALAN GROVES and FARM BOYS INVESTMENTS, LLC |
| TEXTRON AVIATION, INC. and JOHN L. RYNEARSON |
| 26-3085 |
| April 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Property Damage - Product Liability |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 [11281720] Mandate issued. [26-3085] [Entered: 05/13/2026 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 4 [11281719] FRAP 42. Procedural termination without judicial action by Clerk of the Court. [26-3085] [Entered: 05/13/2026 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11281716] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting appellants' voluntary motion to dismiss case. Text only entry - no attachment. Please see case termination entry for the order. [26-3085] [Entered: 05/13/2026 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 [11281464] Motion filed by Appellants Bogdan Cocosel and Loki Operations, LLC to dismiss case. Served on: 05/12/2026. Manner of service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [26-3085] RT [Entered: 05/12/2026 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11277856] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/29/2026 Docketing statement, transcript order form and notice of appearance due 05/14/2026 for Bogdan Cocosel and Loki Operations, LLC. Notice of appearance due on 05/14/2026 for Textron Aviation, Inc.. Disclosure statement due on 05/14/2026 for Loki Operations, LLC and Textron Aviation, Inc. [26-3085] [Entered: 04/30/2026 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.