Spiehs v. Armbrister, et al
Plaintiff: JUSTIN SPIEHS
Defendant: JAY ARMBRISTER, in his individual capacity as Sheriff for Douglas County Kansas, TYLER KRUZEL, in his individual capacity as Deputy for Douglas County Kansas, DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, KRISTEN CHANNELS, in her individual capacity as Lieutenant for the Douglas County Sheriff, Douglas County Kansas and CHASE COLEMAN, in his individual capacity as Deputy for the Douglas County Sheriff, Douglas County Kansas
Case Number: 26-3190
Filed: September 9, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2026 Filing 1 [11316079] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 09/09/2026 Docketing statement, transcript, and notice of appearance due on 09/23/2026 for Justin Spiehs. Notice of appearance due on 09/23/2026 for Jay Armbrister, Kristen Channels, Chase Coleman, Douglas County, Kansas Board of County Commissioners and Tyler Kruzel [26-3190] [Entered: 09/09/2026 03:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Spiehs v. Armbrister, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JUSTIN SPIEHS
Represented By: Linus L. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAY ARMBRISTER, in his individual capacity as Sheriff for Douglas County Kansas
Represented By: Connor Michael Russo
Represented By: Andrew D. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TYLER KRUZEL, in his individual capacity as Deputy for Douglas County Kansas
Represented By: Connor Michael Russo
Represented By: Andrew D. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Represented By: Michelle Rene Stewart
Represented By: Mayda R. Stallbaumer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KRISTEN CHANNELS, in her individual capacity as Lieutenant for the Douglas County Sheriff, Douglas County Kansas
Represented By: Connor Michael Russo
Represented By: Andrew D. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHASE COLEMAN, in his individual capacity as Deputy for the Douglas County Sheriff, Douglas County Kansas
Represented By: Connor Michael Russo
Represented By: Andrew D. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?