United States v. Arambula
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOSE ARAMBULA
Case Number: 26-3241
Filed: November 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2026 Filing 1 [11335942] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 11/10/2026. Ruling on IFP due in district court 12/10/2026 for Jose Arambula. Notice of appearance due on 12/10/2026 for Jose Arambula. Notice of appearance due on 11/24/2026 for United States of America. [26-3241] [Entered: 11/10/2026 04:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States v. Arambula
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSE ARAMBULA
Represented By: Jose Arambula
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Aaron L. Smith
Represented By: Scott C. Rask
Represented By: Michelle McFarlane
Represented By: Jared S. Maag
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?