Patterson v. Rogers
| BRIAN W. PATTERSON |
| DAVID ROGERS, Interim Warden |
| 26-5077 |
| June 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 [11300162] Order filed by Clerk of the Court, on the clerks authority granting Appellant's motion to extend time to file brief and certificate of appealability until 09/02/2026 for Brian W. Patterson. No further extensions will be granted on the clerk's authority. Order denying, without prejudice to renewal, Appellant's motion to exceed page limit for the COA brief. See order for more details and addressing appellant's motion to clarify. Served on 07/20/2026.--[Edited 07/20/2026 by SSB to add docket text.] [26-5077] [Entered: 07/20/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 15 [11299479] Appellant's motion filed by Brian W. Patterson to exceed page limit, extend time to file opening brief and certificate of appealability until 09/02/2026, and to clarify. Served on 07/16/2026. Manner of Service: email. [26-5077] [Entered: 07/16/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 14 [11299405] Appellant's motion received by Brian W. Patterson for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs and fees. Served on 07/16/2026. Manner of Service: email. --[Edited 07/16/2026 by SSB to change pleading to received. IFP motion already filed on 6/26/2026.][26-5077] [Entered: 07/16/2026 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 13 [11299401] Entry of appearance filed by Brian W. Patterson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/16/2026. Manner of Service: email [26-5077] [Entered: 07/16/2026 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 12 [11294819] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 5. Volumes I - V: Pleadings. Volume II consists of sealed state court record. [26-5077] --[Edited 07/02/2026 by SLS to note receipt of audio/video files from district court via SharePoint. See DC Doc. 44.] [Entered: 07/01/2026 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 11 [11293713] Appellant's motion filed by Brian W. Patterson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Served on 06/26/2026. [26-5077] [Entered: 06/26/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 10 [11293700] Entry of appearance filed by Brian W. Patterson. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 06/26/2026. Manner of Service: US mail [26-5077] [Entered: 06/26/2026 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 9 [11292331] Jurisdictional review complete. Notice of appearance due on 08/03/2026 for Brian W. Patterson. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 07/14/2026. [26-5077] [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 8 [11292330] Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting, as modified, appellant's motion to extend time. Fee or IFP forms and appellant's combined opening brief and application for certificate of appealability due 08/03/2026 for Brian W. Patterson. Please see attached order for additional information. Served on 06/23/2026. [26-5077] [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 7 [11292149] Appellant's motion filed by Brian W. Patterson to extend time to file IFP motion and notice of appearance until 08/06/2026. Served on 06/22/2026. Manner of Service: email. [26-5077] [Entered: 06/22/2026 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 [11288911] Order filed by Clerk of the Court lifting the abatement of this appeal. See order for additional information. Served on 06/09/2026. [26-5077] [Entered: 06/09/2026 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 [11288835] Notification of denial of certificate of appealability in district court. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). [26-5077] [Entered: 06/09/2026 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 [11288778] Entry of appearance filed by Tessa L. Henry for David Rogers. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 06/09/2026. Manner of Service: email [26-5077] [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 [11288681] Entry of appearance submitted by Tessa L. Henry for Appellee David Rogers for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 06/09/2026. Manner of Service: US mail.--[Edited 06/09/2026 by SSB to remove pdf from docket; entry filed on 6/9/2026.] [26-5077] TLH [Entered: 06/09/2026 08:57 AM] |
Filing 2
[11288312] Order filed by Judges Bacharach and Phillips directing a limited remand to the district court to consider whether to issue a COA for this appeal and abating this appeal pending district court's decision. Reason for abatement: Limited Remand. Please see attached order for additional information. Served on 06/08/2026. [26-5077]--[Edited 06/08/2026 by MLB to edit docket text] [Entered: 06/08/2026 08:38 AM]
|
| Filing 1 [11288178] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 06/05/2026. Fee or ifp forms and notice of appearance due 07/06/2026 for Brian W. Patterson. Notice of appearance due on 06/22/2026 for David Rogers. [26-5077] [Entered: 06/05/2026 03:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Patterson v. Rogers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BRIAN W. PATTERSON | |
| Represented By: | Brian W. Patterson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DAVID ROGERS, Interim Warden | |
| Represented By: | Tessa L. Henry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
