United States v. Copeland
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| TY WARREN COPELAND |
| 26-5144 |
| October 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 [11332485] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 10/28/2026. Notice of appearance, docketing statement, designation of record, transcript order form, and appointment motion due 11/13/2026 for Ty Warren Copeland. Notice of appearance and disclosure statement due on 11/13/2026 for United States of America. [26-5144] [Entered: 10/30/2026 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Copeland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TY WARREN COPELAND | |
| Represented By: | Cheryl Minnix Thigpen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Augustus Forster |
| Represented By: | Chantelle Dial |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
