Riddles v. Bridges
| MICHAEL RAY RIDDLES |
| CARRIE BRIDGES, Warden |
| 26-6101 |
| July 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 [11295997] Jurisdiction challenged. Response due on 07/28/2026 for Michael Ray Riddles [26-6101] [Entered: 07/07/2026 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 [11295911] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/06/2026. Notice of appearance due on 08/05/2026 for Michael Ray Riddles. Fee or ifp forms due in district cort 08/05/2026 for Michael Ray Riddles. Notice of appearance due on 07/20/2026 for Carrie Bridges. [26-6101]--[Edited 07/06/2026 by ART to correct text] [Entered: 07/06/2026 04:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Riddles v. Bridges | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MICHAEL RAY RIDDLES | |
| Represented By: | Michael Ray Riddles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Mary R. Incremona |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
