Barnett v. Burgum
| ANGELA BARNETT |
| DOUG BURGUM, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior |
| 26-6110 |
| July 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 [11298012] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/13/2026. Docketing statement, notice of appearance, and transcript order form due 07/27/2026 for Angela Barnett. Notice of appearance due on 07/27/2026 for Doug Burgum. [26-6110] [Entered: 07/13/2026 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Barnett v. Burgum | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANGELA BARNETT | |
| Represented By: | Christina Francesca Toon |
| Represented By: | Shaun Southworth |
| Represented By: | Michael Royster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOUG BURGUM, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior | |
| Represented By: | Emily B. Fagan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
