United States v. Hall
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CLEVELAND DAVID HALL, II |
| 26-6133 |
| August 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 [11311681] Criminal case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 08/26/2026. Docketing statement, notice of appearance, designation of record, appointment motion and transcript order form due 09/09/2026 for Cleveland David Hall II. Notice of appearance and disclosure statement due on 09/09/2026 for United States of America.[26-6133] [Entered: 08/26/2026 01:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Hall | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Blanchard Snyder |
| Represented By: | Stephen C. Hoch |
| Represented By: | Drew Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CLEVELAND DAVID HALL, II | |
| Represented By: | Michael Wayne Noland |
| Represented By: | Donald C. Macarthy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
