In re: Armajo v. , et al
| CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR. |
| WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and NEICOLE MOLDEN, Warden of WSP |
| 26-8031 |
| July 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 [11298660] 4 CD's received from Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr. but not filed. Served on 06/25/2026. Manner of Service: US mail. [26-8031] (hard copy only) [Entered: 07/14/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 [11298658] Assorted preliminary documents received from Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr. but not filed. Served on 06/25/2026. Manner of Service: US mail. [26-8031] [Entered: 07/14/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 [11298655] IFP Motion received from Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr. but not filed. Served on 06/25/2026. Manner of Service: US mail. [26-8031] [Entered: 07/14/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 [11298651] Entry of appearance filed by Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr.. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 06/25/2026. Manner of Service: US mail [26-8031] [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 [11298646] Brief in support of petition received from Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr. but not filed. Served on 06/25/2026. Manner of Service: US mail. [26-8031] [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 [11298642] Appellant's motion filed by Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr. to file an oversize brief 107 pages long. Served on 06/25/2026. Manner of Service: US mail. [26-8031] [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 [11298641] Case docketed. Petition for permission to file successive 2254 habeas petition in district court.. DATE RECEIVED: 07/06/2026 [26-8031] [Entered: 07/14/2026 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
