Miesen v. Groff
| NICHOLE MIESEN |
| RICHARD MICHAEL GROFF |
| 26-8050 |
| November 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Stockholder's Suits |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 [11335614] Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 11/09/2026 Docketing statement due 11/24/2026 for Nichole Miesen. Transcript order form due 11/24/2026 for Nichole Miesen. Notice of appearance due on 11/24/2026 for Richard Michael Groff and Nichole Miesen. [26-8050] [Entered: 11/10/2026 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Miesen v. Groff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RICHARD MICHAEL GROFF | |
| Represented By: | Timothy M. Stubson |
| Represented By: | Brandon Pryde |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NICHOLE MIESEN | |
| Represented By: | Jorge Schmidt |
| Represented By: | O. Shane Balloun |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
