Gallegos v. LABR, et al
| JOSEPH GALLEGOS |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and A PLUS PERSONAL CARE PROVIDER |
| 26-9556 |
| June 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 [11292632] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court upon the opening of this petition for review. A review of petitioner's petition has revealed a potential jurisdictional defect. Petitioner's memorandum brief due 07/14/2026 for Joseph Gallegos. The court vacates the deadline for the agency record on appeal. See attached order for details. Served on 06/23/2026. [26-9556] [Entered: 06/23/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 [11292321] Petitioner's motion filed by Joseph Gallegos for permission to file electronically. Served on 06/22/2026. Manner of Service: hand delivery. [26-9556] [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 [11292320] Petitioner's motion filed by Joseph Gallegos for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Served on 06/22/2026. Manner of Service: hand delivery. [26-9556] [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 [11292315] Petition for review filed. Served on 06/22/2026. Manner of Service: Hand delivery - Attorney for Respondent: OSHRC; email - Attorney for Respondents: Office of the Solicitor, Pitler. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 06/23/2026 letter. Agency record due 08/03/2026 for United States Department of Labor. Notice of appearance due on 07/07/2026 for A Plus Personal Care Provider and United States Department of Labor, and Notice of appearance due on 07/23/2026 for Joseph Gallegos. [26-9556] [Entered: 06/23/2026 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
