Jonathan Riches v. Google, Inc.
| JONATHAN LEE RICHES |
| GOOGLE INC. |
| 10-14066 |
| September 1, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Trademark |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Jonathan Lee Riches has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jonathan Lee Riches on 08/26/2010. Fee Status: Three Strikes. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jonathan Riches v. Google, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Movant - appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Lee Riches |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: GOOGLE INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
