Linda Birdette, et al v. American Home Shield, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDA A. BIRDETTE and JAMES A. BIRDETTE
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN HOME SHIELD CORPORATION, Cross Country Home Warranty, Services; Total Protect Home Service Agreement issued by Homesure Services, Inc. and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Case Number: 11-15811
Filed: December 12, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2013 Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Linda A. Birdette is DENIED. SC# 12-6996. [Entered: 01/16/2013 08:59 AM]
November 2, 2012 Notice of Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Linda A. Birdette. SC# 12-6996. [Entered: 11/07/2012 04:10 PM]
September 14, 2012 Your Letter: Appeal from the United States District for the Northern District of Georgia is being returned to you unfiled because this case was closed on 07/05/2012. [Entered: 09/14/2012 03:59 PM]
August 9, 2012 Your Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (2) is being returned to you unfiled because this document is no longer required. [Entered: 08/09/2012 01:35 PM]
July 13, 2012 Notice of filing: Notice of Filing Affidavit as to Appellant James A. Birdette. [Entered: 07/20/2012 05:50 PM]
July 11, 2012 Your Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit (2) is being returned to you unfiled because this document is no longer required. [Entered: 07/11/2012 10:11 AM]
July 5, 2012 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant James A. Birdette and Linda A. Birdette has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 07/05/2012 09:18 AM]
June 25, 2012 Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant papers are being returned. Filing fees ($455) must be paid in full to the district court before this appeal can proceed.. [Entered: 06/25/2012 03:25 PM]
June 6, 2012 Your Plaintiff's Motion to the Court of Appeals is being returned to you unfiled. Appeal has been reinstated, IFP denied, filing fee due 6/25/12. [Entered: 06/12/2012 03:31 PM]
June 6, 2012 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion for reconsideration of single judge's order filed by Appellant Linda A. Birdette is DENIED. [ # 6564379-2 ] GBT and SM [Entered: 06/06/2012 01:14 PM]
May 11, 2012 Appeal clerically reinstated as to Appellants James A. Birdette and Linda A. Birdette because appeal was erroneously dismissed on 05/11/2012. The Appellants sent in motion for reconsideration.--[Edited 07/16/2012 by RAV] [Entered: 05/11/2012 10:36 AM]
May 11, 2012 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant James A. Birdette and Linda A. Birdette has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/11/2012 09:27 AM]
May 4, 2012 MOTION for reconsideration of single judge's order filed by Appellant Linda A. Birdette. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6564379-1] [Entered: 05/11/2012 10:47 AM]
April 20, 2012 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant James A. Birdette is DENIED [ # 6472417-2 ] SM [Entered: 04/20/2012 03:30 PM]
January 17, 2012 Substitute other case participant: Trustee Angela's Team in 11-15811 substituted by Trustee Andrea's Team in 11-15811, Case reassigned from H to new case handler [Case Number 11-15811: Holbrook, Nancy]. [Entered: 01/17/2012 11:18 AM]
December 20, 2011 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant James A. Birdette. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6472417-1] [Entered: 01/20/2012 01:45 PM]
December 15, 2011 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellants James A. Birdette and Linda A. Birdette was filed on 12/09/2011. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 12/15/2011 11:07 AM]
December 12, 2011 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Linda A. Birdette and James Birdette on 12/08/2011. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 12/15/2011 10:51 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Linda Birdette, et al v. American Home Shield, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LINDA A. BIRDETTE
Represented By: Linda A. Birdette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES A. BIRDETTE
Represented By: James A. Birdette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AMERICAN HOME SHIELD CORPORATION, Cross Country Home Warranty, Services; Total Protect Home Service Agreement issued by Homesure Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?