USA v. Nathaniah Frederick
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NATHANIAH FREDERICKS, a.k.a. Niah, a.k.a. Smooth
Case Number: 12-12303
Filed: April 30, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 31, 2013 USA v. Nathaniah Fredericks

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1117111422 Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Nathaniah Fredericks in 12-12303, Appellant Elton Jones in 12-13346, Appellant Antonio Montrese Marlow in 12-14122. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. [12-12303, 12-13346, 12-14122]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Nathaniah Frederick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Robert Edward Bodnar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: NATHANIAH FREDERICKS, a.k.a. Niah, a.k.a. Smooth
Represented By: Rick Carey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?