USA v. Robert Belton, Jr.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
ROBERT LEE BELTON, JR., a.k.a. Pookie, a.k.a. Boss Mac |
12-15387 |
October 19, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mandate issued as to Appellant Robert Lee Belton, Jr.. [Entered: 07/25/2013 01:37 PM] |
Judgment entered as to Appellant Robert Lee Belton, Jr.. [Entered: 06/25/2013 08:34 AM] |
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Robert Lee Belton, Jr.. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. [Entered: 06/25/2013 08:40 AM] |
Reply Brief filed by Appellant Robert Lee Belton, Jr..Service 1/09/2013 by U.S. mail to Attorney for Appellee. [Entered: 02/14/2013 03:42 PM] |
ORDER: The appellant's motion for leave to file a reply brief out of time is GRANTED. [ # 6793678-2 ] (RB) [Entered: 02/14/2013 03:38 PM] |
MOTION for leave to file reply brief out of time filed by Appellant Robert Lee Belton, Jr. [6793678-1] [Entered: 02/14/2013 09:20 AM] |
Public Communication: The appellant's motion to file his reply brief out of time is being returned to him unfiled because he did not serve appellee's counsel. [Entered: 01/25/2013 03:03 PM] |
USDC FRAP 4 Order as to Appellant Robert Lee Belton, Jr. was filed on 10/22/2012. Docket Entry 872. [Entered: 01/23/2013 03:03 PM] |
Public Communication:The appellant has been notified by letter that his reply brief was untimely served and, therefore, he must submit a motion to file the brief out of time. [Entered: 01/14/2013 04:58 PM] |
Record on Appeal filed. Pre-Sentence Report [Entered: 01/16/2013 11:43 AM] |
Supplemental Expanded Record Excerpts [1 VOLUMES - 2 sets] filed by Attorney Scott Grubman for Appellee USA. Service date: 12/21/2012 US mail - Appellant Belton; Attorney for Appellees: Durham, Greenwood, Grubman, Rafferty, Rhodes, Tarver; email - Attorney for Appellees: Stuchell, Tanner. [Entered: 01/09/2013 03:11 PM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellee USA. [Entered: 01/09/2013 12:54 PM] |
Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee USA. Service date: 12/21/2012 US mail - Appellant Belton; Attorney for Appellees: Durham, Greenwood, Rafferty, Rhodes, Tarver; email - Attorney for Appellees: Grubman, Stuchell, Tanner. (ECF: Scott Grubman) [Entered: 12/21/2012 10:30 AM] |
Corrections to brief received on 12/20/2012 from Appellant Robert Lee Belton, Jr. All deficiencies have been corrected. [Entered: 12/20/2012 04:01 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed. [Entered: 02/14/2013 02:11 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Scott G. Grubman for USA (ECF: Scott Grubman) [Entered: 12/17/2012 10:27 AM] |
Added Attorney(s) Scott Grubman for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 12-15387. [Entered: 12/17/2012 02:58 PM] |
Notice of deficient Appellant's Brief filed by Party Robert Lee Belton, Jr. Deficiency: no Certificate of Interested Persons. [Entered: 12/11/2012 03:45 PM] |
Appellant's Brief filed by Robert Lee Belton, Jr. Deficiency: no Certificate of Interested Persons. Service date: 11/22/2012 [12-15387] Attorney for Appellee: Tanner - US mail.--[Edited 12/11/2012 by JOD] [Entered: 12/11/2012 03:31 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brian Tanner for USA. (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 11/09/2012 10:38 AM] |
E-filed Appearance of Counsel filed by Attorney Brian Tanner for Appellee USA in 12-15387 processed. [Entered: 11/09/2012 11:26 AM] |
CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Robert Lee Benton, Jr. on 10/11/2012. Fee Status: IFP Granted (carried over from CJA appointment in USDC). Appellant brief due 40 days from 10/19/2012. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 10/29/2012 12:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.