David Pearson v. SE Property Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee: SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
Case Number: 13-10028
Filed: January 4, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 16, 2013 David Pearson v. SE Property Holdings, LLC

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1117135259 Opinion issued by court as to Appellant David Pearson. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Pearson v. SE Property Holdings, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID PEARSON
Represented By: Steven B. Bauman
Represented By: Jeffrey Leonard Burns
Represented By: Bill R. Hutto
Represented By: Richard Paul Petermann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
Represented By: Brian David Leebrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?