USA v. Vito Smith
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: VITO SMITH
Case Number: 13-10333
Filed: January 24, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 27, 2013 USA v. Vito Smith

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1117146873 Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Vito Smith. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. (Opinion corrected on 8/27/2013 to reflect correct order of judges.)--[Edited 08/27/2013 by JRP]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Vito Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Timothy J. Abraham
Represented By: Wifredo A. Ferrer
Represented By: Alexandra Hui
Represented By: Anne Ruth Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: VITO SMITH
Represented By: Neison M. Marks
Represented By: Michael Caruso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?