USA v. Inocencio Ramirez-Velazco
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: INOCENCIO RAMIREZ-VELAZCO
Case Number: 13-11196
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 25, 2013 USA v. Inocencio Ramirez-Velazco

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1117187781 Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Inocencio Ramirez-Velazco. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. (Opinion corrected on 9/26/2013)--[Edited 09/26/2013 by JRP]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Inocencio Ramirez-Velazco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Donald L. Hansen
Represented By: Robert E. O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: INOCENCIO RAMIREZ-VELAZCO
Represented By: Adam Scott Tanenbaum
Represented By: Rosemary Cakmis
Represented By: Donna Lee Elm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?