Reverse Mortgage Solutions, In v. Neil Gillespie, et al
| REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC. |
| NEIL J. GILLESPIE, as Co-Trustees of the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February 10, 1997 and NEIL J. GILLESPIE |
| 13-11585 |
| April 15, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Reverse Mortgage Solutions, In v. Neil Gillespie, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Danielle N. Parsons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: NEIL J. GILLESPIE, as Co-Trustees of the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February 10, 1997 | |
| Represented By: | Neil J. Gillespie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: NEIL J. GILLESPIE | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
