USA v. Najam Azmat
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
NAJAM AZMAT, a.k.a. Dr. Hazmat |
14-13703 |
August 19, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant requesting status of appeal. [Entered: 10/10/2019 02:38 PM] |
Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Najam Azmat is DENIED. SC# 15-8145. [Entered: 05/17/2016 12:24 PM] |
Checked status of ceritorari 15-8145 filed as to Appellant Najam Azmat - Pending. [Entered: 03/18/2016 03:02 PM] |
Notice of Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Najam Azmat. SC# 15-8145. [Entered: 02/16/2016 02:14 PM] |
RECORD RETURNED. One Folder of Exhibits returned to District Court. [Entered: 12/09/2015 03:12 PM] |
Mandate issued as to Appellant Najam Azmat. [Entered: 12/09/2015 12:01 PM] |
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Najam Azmat. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Published. Opinion method: Signed. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 11/10/2015 11:49 AM] |
Judgment entered as to Appellant Najam Azmat. [Entered: 11/10/2015 11:47 AM] |
Appellee's Supplemental Brief filed by Appellee USA. (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 10/22/2015 10:46 AM] |
Supplemental Appellant's Letter Brief filed by Appellant Najam Azmat. (ECF: William Kent) [Entered: 10/08/2015 04:08 PM] |
Oral Argument CD sent to William Mallory Kent for Najam Azmat by FedEx envelope provided by Mr. Kent . [Entered: 10/01/2015 02:15 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for additional ten (10) minutes per side for oral argument is GRANTED. [ # 7583724-2 ] GBT [Entered: 10/01/2015 04:14 PM] |
Oral argument CD requested by William Mallory Kent for Najam Azmat. [Entered: 10/01/2015 02:09 PM] |
Oral argument held. Oral Argument participants were William Mallory Kent for Appellant Najam Azmat and James C. Stuchell for Appellee USA. [Entered: 09/29/2015 02:09 PM] |
MOTION enlargmnent of time for oral argument filed by Najam Azmat. Motion is Opposed. [7583724-1] (ECF: William Kent) [Entered: 09/25/2015 02:44 PM] |
E-filed Appearance of Counsel processed for Attorney William Mallory Kent for Appellant Najam Azmat in 14-13703. [Entered: 08/18/2015 08:44 AM] |
MOTION Appearance of Counsel form construed as Motion to Appear in Oral Argument filed by Appellant Najam Azmat. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [7552193-1] [Entered: 08/18/2015 08:47 AM] |
ORDER: Attorney William Mallory Kent has submitted an appearance of counsel to appear in this appeal. Consistent with Eleventh Circuit General Order 36, Attorney William Mallory Kent is GRANTED leave to appear in this appeal..ENTERED FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION [ # 7552193-2 ] [Entered: 08/18/2015 02:20 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William Mallory Kent, Co-Counsel for Najam Azmat (ECF: William Kent) [Entered: 08/14/2015 11:32 AM] |
INCORRECT DOC - TC TO ATTY TO FILE CORRECT DOCUMENT****APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William Mallory Kent, Appellant Najam Azmat--[Edited 08/14/2015 by TLH] (ECF: William Kent) [Entered: 08/14/2015 08:38 AM] |
Added Attorney(s) William Mallory Kent for party(s) Appellant Najam Azmat, in case 14-13703. [Entered: 08/14/2015 12:29 PM] |
Attorney James C. Stuchell for Appellee USA hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the printed calendar for 09/29/2015. James C. Stuchell (912) 201-2528 will present argument. (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 07/07/2015 10:21 AM] |
Oral argument scheduled. Argument Date: Tuesday, 09/29/2015 Argument Location: Jacksonville, FL. [Entered: 07/07/2015 10:01 AM] |
Attorney Thomas A Withers for Appellant Najam Azmat hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the printed calendar for. Thomas A. Withers 912-507-8400 will present argument. (ECF: Thomas Withers) [Entered: 07/06/2015 09:10 AM] |
Calendar issued as to cases to be orally argued the week of 09/28/2015 in Jacksonville, Florida. Counsel are directed to electronically acknowledge receipt of this calendar by docketing the Calendar Receipt Acknowledged event in ECF. Counsel must be logged into CM/ECF in order to view the attached calendar. [Entered: 07/02/2015 09:10 AM] |
Additional copies of Appendix received from Thomas A Withers for Najam Azmat and forwarded to the record room. [Entered: 06/02/2015 09:52 AM] |
Assigned to tentative calendar number 30 in Jacksonville during the week of September 28, 2015. Counsel must be logged into CM/ECF in order to view the attached calendar. [Entered: 06/01/2015 10:41 AM] |
The Court has determined that oral argument will be necessary in this case. Please forward 3 additional copies of the 3 volumes of Appendix filed 11/19/14 by Attorney Thomas A Withers for Appellant Najam Azmat to the Clerk's Office, Attention: Jenifer Tubbs. Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. [Entered: 05/29/2015 09:24 AM] |
Appellant's PSI for the Electronic ROA Program filed by Attorney Thomas A Withers for Appellant Najam Azmat. [Entered: 03/11/2015 04:19 PM] |
Received reply paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Najam Azmat. [Entered: 03/02/2015 03:47 PM] |
Notice of deficient Appellant appendix filed by Attorney Thomas A Withers for Appellant Najam Azmat. Deficiencies: Missing PSI. [Entered: 02/26/2015 12:13 PM] |
Reply Brief filed by Appellant Najam Azmat. (ECF: Thomas Withers) [Entered: 02/24/2015 08:55 PM] |
Record on Appeal filed. Exhibits, 1 Folder [Entered: 02/19/2015 09:47 AM] |
Over the phone extension granted by clerk. Updated Reply Brief. Due on 02/24/2015 as to Appellant Najam Azmat. [Entered: 02/05/2015 12:54 PM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellee USA. [Entered: 02/11/2015 03:43 PM] |
Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee USA. (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 01/30/2015 02:47 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for extension to file appellee brief filed by Appellee USA is GRANTED. [ # 7336822-2 ] Appellees brief due on 01/30/2015. AJ [Entered: 12/15/2014 11:49 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file appellees brief to 01/30/2015 filed by USA. Motion is Unopposed. [7336822-1] (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 12/03/2014 04:35 PM] |
Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Najam Azmat. 3 VOLUMES - 3 SETS [Entered: 11/20/2014 02:20 PM] |
Appendix filed [3 VOLUMES] by Appellant Najam Azmat. (ECF: Thomas Withers) [Entered: 11/19/2014 04:55 PM] |
Added Attorney(s) James C. Stuchell for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 14-13703. [Entered: 11/18/2014 12:29 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James C. Stuchell, for USA (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 11/17/2014 01:28 PM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Najam Azmat. [Entered: 11/19/2014 09:03 AM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Najam Azmat. (ECF: Thomas Withers) [Entered: 11/14/2014 10:07 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for extension to file appellant brief filed by Appellant Najam Azmat is GRANTED. [ # 7312121-2 ] Appellants brief due on 11/14/2014. SM [Entered: 11/06/2014 03:11 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file appellants brief to 11/14/2014 filed by Najam Azmat. Motion is Unopposed. [7312121-1] (ECF: Thomas Withers) [Entered: 10/31/2014 04:21 PM] |
Over the phone extension granted by clerk. Appellants brief due on 11/04/2014 as to Appellant Najam Azmat. Appendix due on 11/12/2014 as to Appellant Najam Azmat. [Entered: 10/24/2014 08:20 AM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Najam Azmat. The appellants brief is due on or before 10/28/2014. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 10/09/2014 10:06 AM] |
TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Marie Cowart, Filer: Najam Azmat, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 09/18/2014, Proceeding Type and Date: Trial 01/13/2014 - 01/17/2014. [Entered: 10/08/2014 12:25 PM] |
TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Victoria Root, Filer: Najam Azmat, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 09/03/2014, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 08/06/2014. [Entered: 09/03/2014 03:05 PM] |
Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Marie Cowart, 08/28/2014, Najam Azmat, Trial 01/13/2014 - 01/17/2014. [Entered: 09/02/2014 12:48 PM] |
Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Court Reporter Victoria Root, 08/28/2014, Najam Azmat, Sentencing 08/06/2014. [Entered: 09/02/2014 12:46 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Najam Azmat, Court Reporter: Unknown Reporter, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 08/06/2014. [Entered: 09/02/2014 12:45 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Najam Azmat, Court Reporter: Marie Cowart, Proceeding Type and Date: Trial 01/13/2014 - 01/17/2014. [Entered: 09/02/2014 12:44 PM] |
E-filed Appearance of Counsel processed for Attorney Thomas A Withers for Appellant Najam Azmat in 14-13703. [Entered: 08/26/2014 10:07 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by R. Brian Tanner, for USA (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 08/25/2014 11:05 AM] |
Added Attorney R. Brian Tanner for party Appellee USA, in case 14-13703. [Entered: 08/25/2014 12:50 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas A Withers for Najam Azmat. (ECF: Thomas Withers) [Entered: 08/25/2014 05:38 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Thomas A Withers for Appellant Najam Azmat. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). (ECF: Thomas Withers) [Entered: 08/25/2014 05:42 PM] |
CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Najam Azmat on 08/18/2014. Fee Status: Fee Paid. [Entered: 08/20/2014 08:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.