Ambassador Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Petitioner-Cross Respondent: AMBASSADOR SERVICES, INC.
Respondent-Cross Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Case Number: 14-15341
Filed: November 26, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 12, 2015 Ambassador Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
November 17, 2015 Ambassador Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ambassador Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner-cross respondent: AMBASSADOR SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Matthew Trainor Gomes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent-cross petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Represented By: Linda Dreeben
Represented By: Margaret J. Diaz
Represented By: Robert James Englehart
Represented By: Neil Flaxman
Represented By: Gregoire Sauter
Represented By: Christopher Zerby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?