Carolyn Simmons v. Indian Rivers Mental Health Ce
| CAROLYN SIMMONS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Terri Franks |
| INDIAN RIVERS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER |
| 15-11658 |
| April 16, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Carolyn Simmons v. Indian Rivers Mental Health Center |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Carolyn Simmons v. Indian Rivers Mental Health Ce | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: CAROLYN SIMMONS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Terri Franks | |
| Represented By: | Alicia K. Haynes |
| Represented By: | Charles E. Guerrier |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Drew Haynes |
| Represented By: | Gina Elaine Pearson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: INDIAN RIVERS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER | |
| Represented By: | J. Russell Gibson |
| Represented By: | Bruce H. Henderson |
| Represented By: | Jessica Boyd Humber |
| Represented By: | Terri Olive Tompkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
