USA v. Latwon Mosby
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
LATWON TYRONE MOSBY |
15-11728 |
April 21, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mandate issued as to Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. [Entered: 12/02/2015 11:52 AM] |
Judgment entered as to Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. [Entered: 11/03/2015 07:46 AM] |
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 11/03/2015 07:49 AM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellee USA. [Entered: 08/13/2015 08:48 AM] |
Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee USA. (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 08/03/2015 03:47 PM] |
Added Attorney(s) James C. Stuchell for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 15-11728. [Entered: 07/27/2015 11:59 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James C. Stuchell, for USA (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 07/27/2015 09:42 AM] |
Over the phone extension granted by clerk. Appellee's Brief due on 07/27/2015; extension granted to 08/03/2015 as to Appellee United States of America. Request is unopposed by Attorney Navare. [Entered: 07/21/2015 09:56 AM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. [Entered: 06/30/2015 08:09 AM] |
Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. 1 VOLUMES - 2 SETS [Entered: 06/30/2015 08:18 AM] |
Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby.--[Edited 08/20/2015 by MLS] (ECF: Amit Navare) [Entered: 06/22/2015 02:11 PM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Latwon Tyrone Mosby. (ECF: Amit Navare) [Entered: 06/22/2015 02:03 PM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. The appellants brief is due on or before 07/07/2015. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 06/18/2015 09:52 AM] |
TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Victoria Root, Filer: Latwon T. Mosby, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 05/28/2015, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 04/13/2015, Plea Hearing 01/29/2015. [Entered: 06/03/2015 11:40 AM] |
Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Victoria Root, 05/28/2015, Latwon T. Mosby, Plea Hearing 01/29/2015 , Sentencing 04/13/2015. [Entered: 06/03/2015 11:38 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Latwon T. Mosby, Court Reporter: Victoria Root, Proceeding Type and Date: Plea Hearing 01/29/2015, Sentencing 04/13/2015. [Entered: 05/28/2015 12:34 PM] |
The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismiss by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 05/18/2015 10:25 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Amit Michael Navare for Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 05/18/2015 10:12 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by R. Brian Tanner, for USA (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 05/01/2015 10:32 AM] |
E-filed Appearance of Counsel processed for Attorney R. Brian Tanner for Appellee USA in 15-11728. [Entered: 05/01/2015 02:09 PM] |
CJA 20 voucher issued by this court to Attorney Amit Michael Navare for Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby. [Entered: 04/28/2015 03:28 PM] |
CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Latwon Tyrone Mosby on 04/21/2015. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 04/28/2015 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.