Morris Finley v. PNC Bank, National Association
Plaintiff - Appellant: MORRIS FINLEY
Defendant - Appellee: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, re: Accubanc Mortage Party of 1st part and PNC Bank National Associaiton as Party to the 2nd part, et al successor in interest to National City Real Estate Services, LLC successor by merger with National City Mortgage, Inc
Case Number: 16-10730
Filed: February 17, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Morris Finley v. PNC Bank, National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MORRIS FINLEY
Represented By: Morris Finley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, re: Accubanc Mortage Party of 1st part and PNC Bank National Associaiton as Party to the 2nd part, et al successor in interest to National City Real Estate Services, LLC successor by merger with National City Mortgage, Inc
Represented By: Yasamine Julia Christopherson
Represented By: Greg Michael Taube
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?