Gustavo Gomez v. State of California
| GUSTAVO GOMEZ, Plaintiff is a prisoner of the State of California, confined by the Florida Dept. of Corrections at Dade Correctional Institution under the lnterstate Compact Agreement |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Superior court of California, (County of Ventura), Case No.: CR22052 |
| 16-12147 |
| May 3, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Gustavo Gomez v. State of California |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gustavo Gomez v. State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: GUSTAVO GOMEZ, Plaintiff is a prisoner of the State of California, confined by the Florida Dept. of Corrections at Dade Correctional Institution under the lnterstate Compact Agreement | |
| Represented By: | Gustavo Gomez |
| Represented By: | Dade CI Warden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Superior court of California, (County of Ventura), Case No.: CR22052 | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
