Reginald Chatman v. Deputy Wengert
Plaintiff - Appellee: REGINALD CHATMAN, 111400591 Broward County Mail Jail Inmate Mail/Parcels Post Office Box 9356 Fort lauderdale, FL 33310
Defendant - Appellant: DEPUTY WENGERT, (ccn 13500) BSO Deputy; individually and in their official capacities
Case Number: 16-14882
Filed: July 8, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 6, 2017 Reginald Chatman v. Deputy Wengert

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Reginald Chatman v. Deputy Wengert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: REGINALD CHATMAN, 111400591 Broward County Mail Jail Inmate Mail/Parcels Post Office Box 9356 Fort lauderdale, FL 33310
Represented By: Zachary Dean Ludens
Represented By: Gary M. Pappas
Represented By: Sylvia H. Walbolt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: DEPUTY WENGERT, (ccn 13500) BSO Deputy; individually and in their official capacities
Represented By: Richard T. Woulfe
Represented By: Louis Reinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?