Christopher Vangile v. Commissioner, Social Security
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER VANGILE
Defendant - Appellee: COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 16-16459
Filed: October 11, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W.

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 13, 2017 Christopher Vangile v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Vangile v. Commissioner, Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CHRISTOPHER VANGILE
Represented By: Christopher Vangile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Represented By: Reginald Van Speegle
Represented By: Jeffrey Shaun Wilson
Represented By: Robert Dalton Windham
Represented By: Arthur Lee Bentley
Represented By: Richard Vincent Blake
Represented By: Megan Elizabeth Gideon
Represented By: John F. Rudy
Represented By: Depak Sathy
Represented By: Mary Ann Sloan
Represented By: Susan Kelm Story
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?