Sherwood Investments Overseas v. The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V
| SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS OVERSEAS LIMITED INCORPORATED |
| THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND N.V., f.k.a. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. |
| 16-16824 |
| October 31, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157 |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sherwood Investments Overseas v. The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS OVERSEAS LIMITED INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Sylvia H. Walbolt |
| Represented By: | Michael Beaudine |
| Represented By: | Emmett Kelly Bittick |
| Represented By: | Nicholas A. Brown |
| Represented By: | Mariane Leight Dorris |
| Represented By: | Justin Luna |
| Represented By: | Robert Scott Shuker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND N.V., f.k.a. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. | |
| Represented By: | I. William Spivey |
| Represented By: | Colin Stephen Baker |
| Represented By: | Mark David Bloom |
| Represented By: | Paul J. Keenan |
| Represented By: | Courtney Marie Keller |
| Represented By: | Amy Lowen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
