Michael Pierce, et al v. Clayton County, Georgia, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL PIERCE and MICHELLE PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee: CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, RANDY DUANE BRASHEARS, Individually and in his official capacity as Detective employed by Clayton County, GRANT KIDD, Individually and in his official capacity as an Officer employed by Clayton County, MICHAEL J. REGISTER, Individually and in his official capacity as Police Chief of Clayton County and ROBBIE FREDERICK, Individually and in his official capacity as Property Crimes Unit Supervisor of Clayton County Police Department
Case Number: 16-17046
Filed: November 14, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Pierce, et al v. Clayton County, Georgia, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MICHAEL PIERCE
Represented By: Darryl Levy Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MICHELLE PIERCE
Represented By: Darryl Levy Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA
Represented By: Jack Reynolds Hancock
Represented By: Arash Ali Sabzevari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: RANDY DUANE BRASHEARS, Individually and in his official capacity as Detective employed by Clayton County
Represented By: Jack Reynolds Hancock
Represented By: Arash Ali Sabzevari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: GRANT KIDD, Individually and in his official capacity as an Officer employed by Clayton County
Represented By: Grant Kidd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHAEL J. REGISTER, Individually and in his official capacity as Police Chief of Clayton County
Represented By: Jack Reynolds Hancock
Represented By: Arash Ali Sabzevari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ROBBIE FREDERICK, Individually and in his official capacity as Property Crimes Unit Supervisor of Clayton County Police Department
Represented By: Jack Reynolds Hancock
Represented By: Arash Ali Sabzevari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?