USA v. Vernard Pearsey
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
VERNARD JERICHO PEARSEY |
16-17378 |
December 2, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey is DENIED. SC# 17-6787. The court's mandate having previously issued, no further action will be taken by this court. [Entered: 01/09/2018 12:44 PM] |
Notice of Writ of Certiorari filed as to Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. SC# 17-6787. [Entered: 11/15/2017 03:58 PM] |
Mandate issued as to Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. [Entered: 09/15/2017 02:09 PM] |
RECORD RETURNED. Two Envelopes of Exhibits returned to District Court. [Entered: 09/15/2017 04:11 PM] |
ORDER: The Petition(s) for Rehearing are DENIED and no Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled, the Petition(s) for Rehearing En Banc filed by Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey are DENIED, The Petition(s) for Rehearing are DENIED and no Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled, the Petition(s) for Rehearing En Banc filed by Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey are DENIED. [8232778-1] [Entered: 08/31/2017 11:07 AM] |
Petition for rehearing en banc (with panel rehearing) filed by Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. (ECF: Joseph Phelps) [Entered: 07/20/2017 01:48 PM] |
Notice of deficient petition for rehearing filed by Joseph Latimer Phelps, III for Vernard Jericho Pearsey. Document does not contain a Certificate of Compliance, see FRAP 32(g)(1). Counsel must file a corrected petition within 3 days. [Entered: 07/19/2017 03:36 PM] |
Petition for rehearing en banc (with panel rehearing) filed by Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. (ECF: Joseph Phelps) [Entered: 07/13/2017 12:04 PM] |
Judgment entered as to Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. [Entered: 07/03/2017 10:23 AM] |
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link # http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions . [Entered: 07/03/2017 10:21 AM] |
Record on Appeal filed. Exhibit Envelope, 2 volumes [Entered: 03/23/2017 02:03 PM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellee USA. [Entered: 03/13/2017 08:48 AM] |
Appellee's Brief filed by Appellee USA. (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 03/06/2017 01:13 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by James C. Stuchell, for USA (ECF: James Stuchell) [Entered: 02/24/2017 11:51 AM] |
Added Attorney(s) James C. Stuchell for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 16-17378. [Entered: 02/24/2017 02:09 PM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. [Entered: 02/08/2017 04:10 PM] |
Appellant's SEALED PSI for the Electronic ROA Program filed by Attorney Joseph Latimer Phelps, III for Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. [Entered: 02/08/2017 03:42 PM] |
Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. 1 VOLUMES - 2 SETS [Entered: 02/08/2017 03:39 PM] |
Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. (ECF: Joseph Phelps) [Entered: 02/03/2017 10:50 AM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Vernard Jericho Pearsey. (ECF: Joseph Phelps) [Entered: 02/02/2017 02:15 PM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/07/2017. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 01/05/2017 08:57 AM] |
TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Debbie Gilbert, Filer: Vernard J. Pearsey, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 12/01/2016. [Entered: 01/04/2017 03:45 PM] |
Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Debbie Gilbert, 12/05/2016, Vernard J. Pearsey, Sentencing 12/01/2016. [Entered: 12/29/2016 04:05 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney R. Brian Tanner for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 12/13/2016 02:18 PM] |
No issue regarding guilty plea filed by Attorney Joseph Latimer Phelps, III for Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. (ECF: Joseph Phelps) [Entered: 12/09/2016 03:20 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). (ECF: Joseph Phelps) [Entered: 12/09/2016 03:05 PM] |
Signed SG-1/GP-1 letter has been filed. No plea issues are to be appealed as to Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. [Entered: 12/09/2016 04:14 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Vernard J. Pearsey, Court Reporter: Debbie Gilbert, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 12/01/2016. [Entered: 12/05/2016 11:12 AM] |
CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Joseph Latimer Phelps, III for Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey. [Entered: 12/05/2016 11:15 AM] |
Added Attorney(s) R. Brian Tanner for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 16-17378. [Entered: 12/05/2016 05:34 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by R. Brian Tanner, for USA (ECF: R. Tanner) [Entered: 12/05/2016 04:23 PM] |
CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Vernard Jericho Pearsey on 12/02/2016. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 12/05/2016 11:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.