Ken Cameron, et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEN CAMERON and MICHELLE CAMERON
Defendant - Appellee: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 17-11907
Filed: April 27, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 16, 2018 Ken Cameron, et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ken Cameron, et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: KEN CAMERON
Represented By: Jeffrey Warren Frazer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MICHELLE CAMERON
Represented By: Jeffrey Warren Frazer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: David T. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?