Sandro Dentone v. United States Attorney General, et al
| SANDRO RAPHAEL PUELLES DENTONE |
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Jefferson B. Sessions and WARDEN, FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER MIAMI |
| 18-13359 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion to dismiss appeal as moot filed by Appellees United States Attorney General and Warden, Federal Detention Center Miami is GRANTED. [ # 8559714-2 ] CRW, KCN and ELB [Entered: 10/16/2018 02:24 PM]
|
| MOTION to dismiss appeal as moot filed by United States Attorney General and Warden, Federal Detention Center Miami. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8559714-1] (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 09/10/2018 04:49 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Emily M. Smachetti for USA Attorney Emily M. Smachetti for Appellees United States Attorney General and Warden, Federal Detention Center Miami. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 08/20/2018 05:02 PM] |
| RESPONSE to Motion to stay pending appeal [ # 8535986-2 ] filed by Attorney Emily M. Smachetti for Appellees United States Attorney General and Warden, Federal Detention Center Miami. (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 08/14/2018 01:55 PM] |
|
ORDER: Petitioners Motion to Stay Extradition Proceedings is DENIED because he has not made the requisite showing. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009). The Clerk of Court is directed to treat any motion for reconsideration as a non-emergency matter. [ # 8535986-2 ] SM, WHP and ELB [Entered: 08/14/2018 03:08 PM]
|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily M. Smachetti for United States Attorney General and Warden, Federal Detention Center Miami. (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 08/14/2018 09:07 AM] |
| MOTION to stay pending appeal filed by Sandro Raphael Puelles Dentone. Motion is Opposed. [8535986-1] (ECF: Aimee Ferrer) [Entered: 08/13/2018 05:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Aimee Ferrer for Sandro Raphael Puelles Dentone. (ECF: Aimee Ferrer) [Entered: 08/13/2018 12:24 PM] |
| USDC order: granting in part and denying in part the motion to stay as to Appellant Sandro Raphael Puelles Dentone was filed on 08/09/2018. Docket Entry 17 (see order for complete details). [Entered: 08/13/2018 12:06 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Caruso for Sandro Raphael Puelles Dentone. (ECF: Aimee Ferrer) [Entered: 08/13/2018 12:25 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Aimee Ferrer for Appellant Sandro Raphael Puelles Dentone. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. (ECF: Aimee Ferrer) [Entered: 08/13/2018 12:28 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Aimee Ferrer for Appellant Sandro Raphael Puelles Dentone. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). (ECF: Aimee Ferrer) [Entered: 08/13/2018 04:29 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Sandro Raphael Puelles Dentone on 08/08/2018 08/13/2018. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/13/2018 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
