Kumar Chinnathambi, et al v. Paul Cwalina, et al
| KUMAR CHINNATHAMBI |
| ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI |
| PAUL CWALINA, GWINNETT COUNTY, GA, VALMIKINATHAN P. RAGHUNATHAN, SUNDRAM RAGHUNATHAN and CHANDRAMOHAN LOGANATHAN |
| 18-13364 |
| August 8, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RETURNED UNFILED: IFP motion filed by Annamalai Annamalai is returned unfiled because this case is closed. No further relief is available from this Court. [Entered: 11/26/2018 10:49 AM] |
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Annamalai Annamalai is DENIED. [ # 8602882-2 ] SM and BCG [Entered: 11/15/2018 02:12 PM]
|
| RETURNED UNFILED: Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Annamalai Annamalai is returned unfiled because a motion for leave to proceed has not yet been filed and ruled upon in U.S. District Court. [Entered: 11/08/2018 02:01 PM] |
| RETURNED UNFILED: Emergency Motion to Reinstate filed by Annamalai Annamalai is returned unfiled because of the reason given in the October 5, 2018 letter from this Court, a copy of which is enclosed. [Entered: 10/25/2018 11:37 AM] |
| Complaint, construed as a MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Annamalai Annamalai. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8602882-1] [Entered: 10/26/2018 11:30 AM] |
| Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant - returned unfiled. [Entered: 10/05/2018 11:04 AM] |
| Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant - response to order of dismissal. [Entered: 10/02/2018 03:15 PM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Annamalai Annamalai failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 09/10/2018 11:20 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Timothy W. Boyd for Chandramohan Loganathan, Mark E. Scott for Chandramohan Loganathan, Karen Gilpin Thomas for Gwinnett County, GA and Paul Cwalina, Tuwanda Rush Williams for Gwinnett County, GA and Paul Cwalina and Sundram Raghunathan and Valmikinathan P. Raghunathan. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/06/2018 11:08 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Annamalai Annamalai. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 09/10/2018 11:11 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Annamalai Annamalai. [Entered: 09/10/2018 11:13 AM] |
| Notice of filing: - letter regarding filing of brief as to Appellant Annamalai Annamalai. [Entered: 09/10/2018 11:19 AM] |
| **** PREMATURE ****Appellant's brief filed by Annamalai Annamalai. Service date: 08/21/2018 [18-13364] Attorney for Appellee: Boyd - email; Attorney for Appellee: Scott - US mail; Attorney for Appellee: Thomas - US mail; Attorney for Appellee: Williams - email; Appellee Raghunathan - US mail; Appellee Raghunathan - US mail. [Entered: 09/04/2018 12:30 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Annamalai Annamalai on 08/07/2018. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 08/13/2018 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
