USA v. Antonio Haynes
ANTONIO DENMARK HAYNES |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-10003 |
January 2, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Roy B. Isbell, Filer: Antonio D. Haynes, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 02/11/2019, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 12/13/2018. [Entered: 02/19/2019 02:39 PM] |
MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Antonio Denmark Haynes. Motion is Unopposed. [8695740-1] [19-10003] (ECF: Patricia Kemp) [Entered: 02/14/2019 02:31 PM] |
Court Reporter Acknowledgment filed. Transcript Order: Roy B. Isbell, 01/17/2019, Antonio D. Haynes, Motion Hearing 12/13/2018. [Entered: 02/01/2019 03:57 PM] |
TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Eddie Howard, Filer: Antonio D. Haynes, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 01/25/2019, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 01/23/2006. [Entered: 01/30/2019 04:16 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Antonio D. Haynes, Court Reporter: Roy B. Isbell, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 12/13/2018. [Entered: 01/17/2019 01:04 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Antonio D. Haynes, Court Reporter: Eddie Howard, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 01/23/2006. [Entered: 01/17/2019 01:01 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Christopher John Bodnar for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10003] (ECF: Christopher Bodnar) [Entered: 01/10/2019 03:34 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Christopher Bodnar U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama for USA. [19-10003] (ECF: Christopher Bodnar) [Entered: 01/08/2019 04:13 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Patricia Kemp for Antonio Demark Haynes [19-10003] (ECF: Patricia Kemp) [Entered: 01/07/2019 12:06 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Patricia Kemp for Antonio Demark Haynes. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10003] (ECF: Patricia Kemp) [Entered: 01/07/2019 03:45 PM] |
CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Antonio Denmark Haynes on 12/21/2018. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 01/03/2019 05:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Antonio Haynes | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: ANTONIO DENMARK HAYNES | |
Represented By: | Fred William Tiemann |
Represented By: | Patricia Vanessa Kemp |
Represented By: | Carlos Alfredo Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Christopher John Bodnar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.