Earth Science Tech, Inc. v. Impact UA, Inc., et al
IMPACT UA, INC., SLAVIK NENAYDOKH, MICHAEL BRUBECK and CROMOGEN BIOTECHNOLOGY CORPORATION |
EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC. |
19-10118 |
January 9, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Earth Science Tech, Inc. v. Impact UA, Inc., et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 05/01/2019 filed by Earth Science Tech, Inc.. Motion is Unopposed. [8712523-1] [19-10118] (ECF: Melissa Visconti) [Entered: 03/06/2019 02:20 PM] |
![]() |
MOTION Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel filed by Earth Science Tech, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8702521-1] [19-10118] (ECF: Melissa Visconti) [Entered: 02/22/2019 05:00 PM] |
![]() |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Melissa Damian Visconti for Earth Science Tech, Inc. [19-10118] (ECF: Allison Leonard) [Entered: 02/14/2019 03:15 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 04/05/2019 filed by Earth Science Tech, Inc.. Motion is Unopposed. [8696079-1] [19-10118] (ECF: Melissa Visconti) [Entered: 02/14/2019 10:18 PM] |
![]() |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Edward F. Holodak for Appellant Earth Science Tech, Inc.. [Entered: 02/12/2019 03:44 PM] |
MOTION for leave to file Civil Appeal Statement out of time filed by Earth Science Tech, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8691893-1] [19-10118]--[Edited 02/12/2019 by CW to correct docket text] (ECF: Edward Holodak) [Entered: 02/11/2019 11:53 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Edward F. Holodak for Appellant Earth Science Tech, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10118] (ECF: Edward Holodak) [Entered: 02/08/2019 05:13 PM] |
RETURNED UNFILED: Civil Appeal Statement filed by Edward F. Holodak for Earth Science Tech, Inc. is returned unfiled because this document is out of time. You must request permission from the Court to file this document. Please attach the Civil Appeal Statement as an exhibit to the motion for leave to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time. [Entered: 02/08/2019 05:35 PM] |
**RETURNED UNFILED** Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Edward F. Holodak for Appellant Earth Science Tech, Inc.. [19-10118]--[Edited 02/08/2019 by CW - Filed without permission] (ECF: Edward Holodak) [Entered: 02/08/2019 05:12 PM] |
**SECOND** NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Edward F. Holodak for Earth Science Tech, Inc.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/07/2019 03:49 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Edward F. Holodak for Earth Science Tech, Inc.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/31/2019 01:00 PM] |
Attorney Edward F. Holodak for Appellant Earth Science Tech, Inc. has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:31 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Edward F. Holodak for Earth Science Tech, Inc. [19-10118] (ECF: Edward Holodak) [Entered: 01/25/2019 04:09 PM] |
Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Edward F. Holodak for Earth Science Tech, Inc. An incorrect form was used. You must use the form on the 11th Circuit website at http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/. Counsel must file a corrected Appearance of Counsel form. [Entered: 01/25/2019 04:26 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Edward F. Holodak for EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC. [19-10118] (ECF: Edward Holodak) [Entered: 01/25/2019 04:45 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Joseph P. Klapholz for Appellant Earth Science Tech, Inc.. No hearings. [Entered: 01/11/2019 02:20 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Earth Science Tech, Inc. on 01/08/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/19/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/23/2019 as to Appellant Earth Science Tech, Inc.. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/06/2019 as to Appellee Cromogen Biotechnology Corporation [Entered: 01/11/2019 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.