Christopher Manikowski v. Secretary, Department of Corr.
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MANIKOWSKI |
19-10153 |
January 14, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion for extension of time of thirty (30) days to file a motion for COA filed by Appellant Christopher William Manikowski is GRANTED. [ # 8712527-2 ] COA due on 04/08/2019. AJ [Entered: 03/08/2019 11:00 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 04/05/2019 filed by Christopher William Manikowski. Motion is Unopposed. [8712527-1] [19-10153] (ECF: Michael Ufferman) [Entered: 03/06/2019 02:22 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10153] (ECF: Thomas Duffy) [Entered: 02/06/2019 09:40 AM] |
ORDER: Motion for extension to file motion for COA filed by Appellant Christopher William Manikowski is GRANTED. [ # 8680361-2 ] COA due on 03/06/2019. AJ [Entered: 02/04/2019 02:08 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 02/27/2019 filed by Christopher William Manikowski. Motion is Unopposed. [8680361-1] [19-10153] (ECF: Michael Ufferman) [Entered: 01/28/2019 05:07 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael Robert Ufferman for Appellant Christopher William Manikowski. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10153] (ECF: Michael Ufferman) [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:59 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas Howland Duffy for Secretary [19-10153] (ECF: Thomas Duffy) [Entered: 01/28/2019 03:05 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Robert Ufferman for Christopher William Manikowski. [19-10153] (ECF: Michael Ufferman) [Entered: 01/28/2019 04:54 PM] |
USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Christopher William Manikowski was filed on 12/11/2018. Docket Entry 36. [Entered: 01/16/2019 11:25 AM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Christopher William Manikowski on 01/10/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/16/2019 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Christopher Manikowski v. Secretary, Department of Corr. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
Represented By: | Ashley Moody |
Represented By: | Thomas Howland Duffy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MANIKOWSKI | |
Represented By: | Michael Robert Ufferman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.