Jeffrey Houston v. Gulf Correctional Institution, et al
| SMITH, Classification Officer Gulf Correctional Institution, GULF CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FAISON, Classification Officer Gulf Correctional Institution, WALSEN, Classification Counselor Gulf Correctional Institution and PINELLAS COUNTY EMERGENCY MENTAL HEALTH UNIT |
| JEFFREY HOUSTON |
| 19-10192 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Jeffrey Houston was filed on 03/05/2019. Docket Entry 30. [Entered: 03/06/2019 11:43 AM] |
| **DOCKETED IN ERROR**Appeal clerically reinstated as to Appellant Jeffrey Houston because appeal was erroneously dismissed on 02/22/2019. The motion for ifp was timely filed in district court.--[Edited 02/25/2019 by GMP] [Entered: 02/25/2019 10:24 AM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Jeffrey Houston has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 02/22/2019 03:29 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Jeffrey Houston. [Entered: 02/13/2019 09:59 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Jeffrey Houston. [Entered: 02/08/2019 11:57 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jeffrey Houston on 01/10/2019. Fee Status: PLRA 3 Strikes. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/17/2019 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
