Davis O'Leary VI, LTD v. Peterson Contractors, Inc.
| DAVIS O'LEARY VI, LTD |
| PETERSON CONTRACTORS, INC. |
| 19-10205 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Michael Darrell Johnson for Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD, Natalie Nicole Mark for Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD and Craig K. Pendergrast for Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. [Entered: 03/05/2019 09:56 AM] |
| RESPONSE to Motion filed by Appellee Peterson Contractors, Inc. [ # 8697259-2 ] filed by Attorney Michael Darrell Johnson for Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. [19-10205] (ECF: Michael Johnson) [Entered: 03/01/2019 06:11 PM] |
| USDC order: For the reasons set forth, Defendants Motion for Mistrial is hereby GRANTED and Defendants Motion for a New Trial or for Judgment as a Matter of Law, [Doc. No. 235] is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. A new trial as to all issues will be held. as to Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD was filed on 02/25/2019. Docket Entry 248. [Entered: 02/28/2019 09:05 AM] |
| Amended Motion [ # 8702490-2 ] filed by Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. [19-10205] (ECF: Craig Pendergrast) [Entered: 02/25/2019 10:09 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to file Plaintiff-Appellant's Motion For Leave to File Civil Appeal Statement Out of Time out of time filed by Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8702490-1] [19-10205] (ECF: Craig Pendergrast) [Entered: 02/22/2019 04:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Darrell Johnson for Davis O'Leary VI, LTD and Natalie Nicole Mark for Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. [19-10205] (ECF: Michael Johnson) [Entered: 02/21/2019 12:58 PM] |
| Notice of deficient Civil Appeal Statement filed by Craig K. Pendergrast for Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. Document filed without leave of the Court. please see notice dated 2/13/19 [Entered: 02/21/2019 04:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Craig K. Pendergrast for Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. [19-10205] (ECF: Craig Pendergrast) [Entered: 02/21/2019 04:38 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Craig K. Pendergrast for Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. [19-10205] (ECF: Craig Pendergrast) [Entered: 02/20/2019 02:36 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction filed by Peterson Contractors, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8697259-1] [19-10205] (ECF: David Atkinson) [Entered: 02/18/2019 03:06 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney David M. Atkinson for Appellee Peterson Contractors, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10205] (ECF: David Atkinson) [Entered: 02/18/2019 03:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David M. Atkinson for Peterson Contractors, Inc.. [19-10205] (ECF: David Atkinson) [Entered: 02/18/2019 03:02 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to David M. Atkinson for Peterson Contractors, Inc.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:13 AM] |
| Michael Darrell Johnson for Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD, Natalie Nicole Mark for Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD and Craig K. Pendergrast for Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 02/13/2019 12:27 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Craig K. Pendergrast for Davis O'Leary VI, Ltd.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10205] (ECF: Craig Pendergrast) [Entered: 02/07/2019 06:18 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Davis O'Leary VI, LTD, Court Reporter: Shannon Welch, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 08/17/2016 ; Transcript Order: Filer: Davis O'Leary VI, LTD, Court Reporter: Andy Ashley, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 06/26/2017 , Motion Hearing 11/30/2018 ; Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Jana Colter, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 01/16/2018. [Entered: 02/13/2019 12:24 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD on 01/16/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/06/2019 as to Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/13/2019 as to Appellee Peterson Contractors, Inc. [Entered: 01/25/2019 12:06 PM] |
| Court Reporter acknowledgment not filed. Letter issued to Court Reporter Andy Ashley, Jana Colter and Shannon Welch as to Appellant Davis O'Leary VI, LTD. Transcript is due to be filed in District Court 30 days from 01/30/2019. [Entered: 02/28/2019 09:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
