Alexandra Puerta Yanez, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
ALEXANDRA DEL CARMEN PUERTA YANEZ, DANIELA NAZARETH FERNANDEZ PUERTA, DANIEL ALEJANDRO FERNANDEZ PUERTA and JOHAN JOSE GREGORIO FERNANDEZ PONCE |
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
19-10235 |
January 18, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Alexandra Del Carmen Puerta Yanez, et al. v. U.S. Attorney General |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Briefing Notice issued to Petitioners Johan Jose Gregorio Fernandez Ponce, Daniel Alejandro Fernandez Puerta, Daniela Nazareth Fernandez Puerta and Alexandra Del Carmen Puerta Yanez. The petitioner's brief is due on or before 04/01/2019. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the petitioner's brief. [Entered: 02/20/2019 10:17 AM] |
BIA Record on Appeal Filed [19-10235] (ECF: DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review) [Entered: 02/19/2019 02:34 PM] |
AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney: Mary Teruya. Parties: Puerta Yanez, Alexandra del Carment; Fernandez Ponce, Johan Jose Gregorio; Fernandez Puerta, Daniela Nazareth; Fernandez Puerta, Daniel Alejandro. Attorney Mary Hatsue Teruya for Petitioners Johan Jose Gregorio Fernandez Ponce, Daniel Alejandro Fernandez Puerta, Daniela Nazareth Fernandez Puerta and Alexandra Del Carmen Puerta Yanez. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10235] (ECF: Mary Teruya) [Entered: 02/09/2019 12:50 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Mary Hatsue Teruya for Alexandra Del Carmen Puerta Yanez, Johan Jose Gregorio Fernandez Ponce, Daniela Nazareth Fernandez Puerta and Daniel Alejandro Fernandez Puerta. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/04/2019 10:32 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Mona Maria Yousif for Respondent, Acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10235] (ECF: Mona Yousif) [Entered: 01/23/2019 01:01 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mona Maria Yousif [19-10235] (ECF: Mona Yousif) [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:12 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Attorney Mary Hatsue Teruya for Petitioner Alexandra Del Carmen Puerta Yanez in 19-10235, Attorney Mary Hatsue Teruya for Petitioner Daniela Nazareth Fernandez Puerta in 19-10235, Attorney Mary Hatsue Teruya for Petitioner Daniel Alejandro Fernandez Puerta in 19-10235, Attorney Mary Hatsue Teruya for Petitioner Johan Jose Gregorio Fernandez Ponce in 19-10235. [Entered: 01/22/2019 02:31 PM] |
AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioners Johan Jose Gregorio Fernandez Ponce, Daniel Alejandro Fernandez Puerta, Daniela Nazareth Fernandez Puerta and Alexandra Del Carmen Puerta Yanez. Fee Status: Fee Paid. 01/18/2019. [Entered: 01/22/2019 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.