Bianca Jackson v. Warden, Arrendale SP
ARRENDALE SP WARDEN |
BIANCA LEA JACKSON |
19-10281 |
January 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Christopher Michael Carr for Arrendale SP Warden. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/22/2019 03:20 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Joseph M. Raffauf for Bianca Lea Jackson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/11/2019 03:35 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY issued in error. CIP Already Filed [Entered: 02/11/2019 03:40 PM] |
Received corrected Efiling from previously deficient Motion filed by Joseph M. Raffauf for Bianca Lea Jackson. [Entered: 02/01/2019 01:25 PM] |
MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Bianca Lea Jackson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8683648-1] [19-10281] (ECF: Joseph Raffauf) [Entered: 02/01/2019 09:28 AM] |
Notice of deficient Motion for Certificate of Appealability attached to CIP filed by Joseph M. Raffauf for Bianca Lea Jackson. Incorrect Document Attached to Event. [Entered: 01/31/2019 05:29 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Joseph M. Raffauf for Appellant Bianca Lea Jackson. [19-10281] (ECF: Joseph Raffauf) [Entered: 01/30/2019 01:09 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [19-10281] (ECF: Joseph Raffauf) [Entered: 01/29/2019 07:13 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10281] (ECF: Joseph Raffauf) [Entered: 01/29/2019 07:20 AM] |
USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Bianca Lea Jackson was filed on 01/04/2019. Docket Entry 14. [Entered: 01/28/2019 12:29 PM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Bianca Lea Jackson on 01/18/2019. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/28/2019 12:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Bianca Jackson v. Warden, Arrendale SP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: ARRENDALE SP WARDEN | |
Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: BIANCA LEA JACKSON | |
Represented By: | Joseph M. Raffauf |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.