USA v. Seth Murray
| SETH DANIEL MURRAY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-10316 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Seth Daniel Murray is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 8725704-2 ] [Entered: 03/22/2019 11:25 AM]
|
| MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Appellant Seth Daniel Murray. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8725704-1] [Entered: 03/22/2019 09:21 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Seth Daniel Murray. No hearings. [Entered: 02/26/2019 04:35 PM] |
| Public Communication: Letter to Appellant that IFP motion has been forwarded to USDC for ruling, and that no further action will be taken in the appeal as it is dismissed, unless a motion to reinstate is filed. [Entered: 02/26/2019 04:41 PM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Seth Daniel Murray failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court and file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 02/20/2019 03:28 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Seth Daniel Murray. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/06/2019 09:26 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Phillip Drew DiRosa for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-10316] (ECF: Phillip DiRosa) [Entered: 02/05/2019 08:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Phillip DiRosa for USA [19-10316] (ECF: Phillip DiRosa) [Entered: 02/04/2019 07:12 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily M. Smachetti for USA. [19-10316] (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 01/31/2019 02:45 PM] |
| CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Seth Daniel Murray on 01/22/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 01/28/2019 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Seth Murray | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: SETH DANIEL MURRAY | |
| Represented By: | Seth Daniel Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Emily M. Smachetti |
| Represented By: | Phillip Drew DiRosa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
