Gregory Makozy v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
GREGORY MAKOZY |
DAVID FUCHS, LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT O. LAMPL, WANDA QUILES, G. FANTANUCCI and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
19-10396 |
January 30, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Gregory Makozy. [Entered: 03/08/2019 10:56 AM] |
MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Gregory Makozy. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8714494-1] [Entered: 03/08/2019 10:58 AM] |
RETURNED UNFILED: Motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis filed by Gregory Makozy is returned unfiled because this relief is pending in the district court. [Entered: 03/05/2019 04:32 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Gregory Makozy. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/28/2019 12:29 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Gregory Makozy. [Entered: 03/05/2019 04:35 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Gregory Makozy on 01/30/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/13/2019 as to Appellant Gregory Makozy [Entered: 02/04/2019 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.