Bill Williams v. Gregg Dozier, et al
COBB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, GREGG DOZIER, Georgia Department of Corrections, COBB COUNTY, MARY STALEY-CLARK and REBECCA KEATON |
BILL WILLIAMS |
19-10400 |
January 31, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RETURNED UNFILED: Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Bill Williams is returned unfiled because this case is closed. No further relief is available from this Court.. [Entered: 03/19/2019 12:51 PM] |
Notice of Change of Address for Party Bill Williams. [Entered: 03/19/2019 12:50 PM] |
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Bill Williams failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/01/2019 10:18 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Bill Williams. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/15/2019 08:46 AM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Bill Williams on 01/30/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/04/2019 09:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.