Robert Rowles v. GEO Group Inc., et al
| JULES HELLER, M.D., Chief Medical Health Officer at South Bay Correctional Rehabilitation Facility, WARDEN and GEO GROUP INC. |
| ROBERT ROWLES |
| 19-10419 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Robert Rowles. [Entered: 03/13/2019 11:43 AM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Robert Rowles failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/06/2019 01:46 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Robert Rowles. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 03/01/2019 02:02 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Robert Rowles. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/22/2019 03:10 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Robert Rowles on 02/04/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/06/2019 08:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
